First published: Sun 23 Feb 2020.
Els Slots
Whs #732: Vézère Valley
Comments
7 comments
Clyde
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 23, 2020)
Seems like the new Lascaux IV replica is quite disappointing. Not only is it more expensive but it's not a cave replica like Lascaux II (14e entrance) but a replica of the wall paintings hanging in the air.
Font de Gaume seems worth visiting. Is photography not allowed there?
Reply
Tsunami
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 23, 2020)
I think it was also in February in 2009 when I visited the Font de Gaume, staying overnight in Les Eyzies and walking to the cave entrance early in the morning. The fact that I have only a photo of the entrance to the cave (just like one by Els here) makes me think no photos were allowed inside, which makes sense. But the main thing I remember is that I bought a T-shirt with some paintings from the cave, but it was lost in mail from France to LA.
Incidentally, a few weeks ago this February when I was in France, I missed out on going to Grotte Chauvet from Avignon, due to the lack of proper prep and the lack of public transportation in winter. Hope to go back to France this summer.
Els Slots
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 23, 2020)
Indeed, photos are not allowed in Font de Gaume. You cannot bring anything into the cave and you even have to tuck your hoodie into your jacket/coat to prevent scratches onto the rock surface (it is very narrow and dark inside).
P.S.: according to your review you have visited Font de Gaume as well (albeit some years ago), Clyde?
Zoë Sheng
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 23, 2020)
Yeah that hall at the end with the visual/audio stuff using the tablet is just plain waste of time, to make us think the entrance cost is worth the money, right? The guide was always saying the art would "blow our minds" but well...I could have seen it in 5 minutes and it took him 20min to get us all excited instead.
Clyde
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 23, 2020)
Yes indeed. I'm glad it's still possible to visit, but like Tsunami I have no photos of the interior.
Dennis Nicklaus
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 25, 2020)
I haven't ben to Lascaux (yet!), but maybe some of you can tell me why Lascaux I is the most pre-eminent "cave man art" cave? I feel it is the only one that would have any name recognition in the general public. Are the drawings there that much better or numerous than what you saw in Font de Gaume or others saw at Rouffignac? I haven't been to Lascaux, but I feel incredibly privileged to have gone inside Grotte de Niaux near the Pyrenees a couple years ago and to see the prehistoric art there. Your description of the paintings in Font de Gaume makes them sound better than Niaux, but maybe you're just a better writer. Is Lascaux even better? Or was it just the first to become famous and is shorthand for the entire region?
Els Slots
5 years, 4 months ago (Feb 25, 2020)
Lascaux I is much bigger than Font de Gaume, with a lot more paintings. So in that way it is special.
Both have polychrome paintings, while the Grotte de Niaux 'only' has black-outlined drawings.
Whether Lascaux I is better than the Chauvet Cave (Pont d'Arc), which was discovered much later, I couldn't say.