Sites of Saytagrah, India's non-violent freedom mo by Bernard Joseph Esposo Guerrero
I visited two sites included in this serial nomination back in 2019, the Sabarmati ashram (Gujarat) and the Asiatic Society of Mumbai Town Hall (Maharashtra). The sites are interesting, but they apparently face the same dilemma as the Luther sites in Germany: what is celebrated in these sites are not what were built per se, but more of what had happened in them. Is it a bad thing? Not necessarily. If we look past the unassuming structures, we realize that what transpired in these places are truly worth celebrating and the ideas that were cultivated here are indeed to be emulated. Heritage, after all, goes beyond built-structures; a "heritage" ought to have a spirit, a meaning, and these places certainly possess those. While the whole idea of Satyagraha might be difficult to grasp by just visiting one or two sites, it does not preclude the fact that the careful selection of representative component sites comprising this nomination can make a sound case for an outstanding universal value. The Sabarmati/Ghandi ashram in historic Ahmedabad (another memorable WHS for me!), for example, is undoubtedly a world-class memorial and a continuing living heritage space (so much so that even the principles employed in managing the site are highly Ghandian!) whose importance transcends beyond national level.
I have also visited related sites in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa where the idea was conceptualized and was first observed. The whole essence of non-violence social protest would, likewise, resound much later on in my country during the People Power revolution in toppling down the dictator. Hence, it has clear lasting influences. It would definitely make me happy to see this site be included in the list one day as it well deserves it.
The list would definitely be benefited from having more sites that represent freedom from colonial oppression and the rise of national identities in the 20th century especially from this side of the globe. While I feel that criteria (vi) is easily met, crit. (iv) only argues for the ashrams and not for the others in the nomination. The nomination might have to be reworked, perhaps further narrowing down the sites included and where even crit. (iii) may be explored.