Cultural sites rejected for Natural criteria

Connected Sites: 22

Definition
Cultural sites for which UNESCO has, so far, declined also to inscribe on Natural criteria as requested by the state Party.

Map

Connected Sites

  • Mont-Saint-Michel
    Inscribed: 1979
    4.17
    329
    17
  • Mount Qingcheng and Dujiangyan
    Inscribed: 2000
    3.40
    74
    4
    "The Committee discussed the question of inscription under natural criteria, a proposal for the construction of a dam by the water conservancy project and the issue of sacred mountains in China. The Committee noted that Mt Qingcheng is considered to meet natural criteria (ii) and (iv). However, it decided to defer the nomination under natural criteria...."
  • Viñales Valley
    Inscribed: 1999
    3.09
    113
    3
  • Pico Island
    Pico Island
    Portugal
    Inscribed: 2004
    3.34
    58
    4
    Portugal's Pico Island was initially submitted as a mixed site in 2003, before being revised and nominated as a cultural landscape in 2004.
  • Cilento and Vallo di Diano
    Inscribed: 1998
    3.39
    169
    5
    Initially nominated as a mixed site but rejected for natural values (1998 Bureau Ordinary Session).
  • Incense Route of the Negev
    Inscribed: 2005
    2.92
    81
    7
    The site was originally proposed as Makhteshim Country (mixed). After a deferral in 2001 the site was separated into a cultural nomination (Incense Route) and a natural nomination (Makhteshim Country). In 2005 the natural nomination was withdrawn and the cultural accepted
  • Saloum Delta
    Inscribed: 2011
    2.86
    38
    4
    It was proposed as a Mixed nomination in 2011, but the natural criterion (X) was referred and never followed-up.
  • Inscribed: 2024
    1.47
    19
    3
    Initially nominated as a mixed site but rejected for natural values
  • Matobo Hills
    Inscribed: 2003
    3.20
    45
    2
    The minutes of the Bureau of 1984 state that the site had been reviewed by both ICOMOS AND IUCN (which seems to imply that it must have been nominated on both Natural and Culturla ciriteria -the concept of "Cultural Landscape" wasn't then accepted by UNESCO). ICOMOS had been positive regarding the rock art and Zimbabwe was asked to resubmit with greater clarity regarding both the natural and cultural criteria. See page 16
    See whc.unesco.org
  • Serra da Capivara
    Inscribed: 1991
    3.11
    12
    6
    Rejected in 2003
  • Saint Catherine Area
    Inscribed: 2002
    3.50
    106
    8
    In 2002 Egypt originally asked for a "mixed" inscription but the site was only inscribed on cultural criteria. In 2003 it submitted a larger area in an attempt to gain inscription under natural criteria as well but this was again rejected
  • Richtersveld
    Richtersveld
    South Africa
    Inscribed: 2007
    2.78
    14
    3
    In 2007 S Africa asked for inscription under natural criteria ix and x as well as cultural iv and v but this aspect was deferred as IUCN was concerned that the site wasn't large enough to meet the conditions of integrity and biodiversity
  • Qadisha Valley
    Inscribed: 1998
    3.31
    65
    4
  • Mount Wutai
    Inscribed: 2009
    3.56
    45
    4
  • Mount Carmel Caves
    Inscribed: 2012
    2.23
    72
    5
    Rejected for natural criterium 8 (was proposed as a mixed site, went on to be inscribed as a cultural site)
  • Masada
    Masada
    Israel
    Inscribed: 2001
    3.77
    194
    11
    There was an attempt for Masada to be nominated for natural values as part of the Great Rift Valley.
  • Lushan National Park
    Inscribed: 1996
    2.92
    54
    3
    In 1996 China asked for a "mixed" inscription but the site was only inscribed on cultural criteria
  • Fertö/Neusiedlersee
    Fertö/Neusiedlersee
    Austria, Hungary
    Inscribed: 2001
    2.29
    187
    8
    "Although the site was originally nominated as a mixed site, the Committee did not inscribe Fert?/Neusiedlersee on the World Heritage List under natural criteria. "
  • Curonian Spit
    Curonian Spit
    Lithuania, Russia
    Inscribed: 2000
    3.28
    164
    7
    "Concerning natural values, the Committee noted that the Curonian Spit is an important site at the European scale and very significant within the Baltic Region as a whole. However, it was not considered to meet the criteria for inscription on the World Heritage List as a natural property."
  • Inscribed: 2024
    2.90
    5
    2
    Initially on T List as a mixed site in 2014 (Criteria: (iii)(iv)(v)(vi)(vii)), before being revised and nominated as a cultural landscape in 2024.
  • Coro and its Port
    Inscribed: 1993
    2.64
    16
    2
    Coro Dunes National Park was part of the Original nomination, but not inscribed
  • Zagori Cultural Landscape
    Inscribed: 2023
    3.24
    52
    5