Connected Sites
Insc 2000 Without Buffer Zone. "Given The Strong Legislative Protection In Force In The Region, And In Particular In The Sierra Maestra Grand National Park, It Therefore Appeared To Icomos That It Would Be Desirable For The Entire Area To Be Inscribed On The List, Without A Buffer Zone" (Ab Eval)
Insc 1988. Subsequently Came Under Pressure To Identify Buffer Zones (31 Com 7b.90 - "Urges The State Party To Adopt The Policies Set Out In The Heritage Protection White Paper .....By Updating The Site Boundaries And Buffer Zones;". "The Mission Spent Some Considerable Amount Of Time Discussing And Understanding The Absence Of Buffer Zones For Both The Tower And Westminster World Heritage Sites, Which Instead Are Replaced By The Definition Of "Settings".... "Overall, It Was Explained, The Term "Buffer Zone" Carries A Negative Connotation In The Uk. It's Perceived As Being Overly Restrictive In That It Provides For A Blanket Protection, Which Is Not Fit For Complex, Dynamic Urban Environments. Instead, It Was Put Forward, Setting Is A Much Broader Concept Than Buffer Zone, Which Is Often A Hard Line On A Map,".... "In Order Not To Bother Too Much With The Semantics, It Was Commonly Agreed That The Appropriate Policies At A Local Level, And Their Implementation, Make The Protection And Conservation Of World Heritage Sites Effective - Whether Surrounded By A Buffer Zone Or A Designated Setting (Mission Report Dec 2011)
Insc 1987 Subsequently Came Under Pressure To Identify Buffer Zones (32 Com 8b.72 -" Recommends That A Buffer Zone With A View To Protecting The Visual Integrity Of The Inscribed Property In Its Environment Be Created"). "The Mission Spent Some Considerable Amount Of Time Discussing And Understanding The Absence Of Buffer Zones For Both The Tower And Westminster World Heritage Sites, Which Instead Are Replaced By The Definition Of "Settings".... "Overall, It Was Explained, The Term "Buffer Zone" Carries A Negative Connotation In The Uk. It's Perceived As Being Overly Restrictive In That It Provides For A Blanket Protection, Which Is Not Fit For Complex, Dynamic Urban Environments. Instead, It Was Put Forward, Setting Is A Much Broader Concept Than Buffer Zone, Which Is Often A Hard Line On A Map,".... "In Order Not To Bother Too Much With The Semantics, It Was Commonly Agreed That The Appropriate Policies At A Local Level, And Their Implementation, Make The Protection And Conservation Of World Heritage Sites Effective - Whether Surrounded By A Buffer Zone Or A Designated Setting (Mission Report Dec 2011)
Insc 2014 Without Buffer Zone "The Nominated Property Enjoys The Highest Level Of Protection At The National Level As Well As A Well-Established And Effective Management That Ensures Adequate Maintenance And Presentation To The Public.However, The Absence Of A Buffer Zone Coupled With A High Density Of Archaeological Features Located In The Vicinity Of Poverty Point And A Legal Framework Which Protects Designated Properties Only From Publicly-Driven Or Funded Development Activities Raise Some Concerns With Regard To The Retention Of The Integrity Of The Property In The Long Term" (Ab Eval)..... Icomos Asked That Additional Safeguards/Actions "Should Be Put In Place To Act Like A Buffer Zone"
Insc 2010 Without Buffer Zone "The Nominated Property Has No Buffer Zone, As It Is In An Extremely Remote Region And Its Boundaries Have Been Set At 50 Nautical Miles (~100km) Out Over Open Sea From Each Of The Islands And Atolls"....."Iucn Considers That The Boundaries Of The Nominated Property Meet The Requirements Set Out In The Operational Guidelines"
"4.1.1 - Buffer Zone Status. There Is No Buffer Zone, And It Is Not Needed" (May 20, 2014 Unesco Periodic Report - Section Ii- Mammoth Cave National Park)
South Africa Deemed It Unnecessary, And There Is A De Facto 10 Km Zone Around The Nominated Property Subject To The National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act (Ab Ev)
No Buffer Zone Proposed And Iucn Accepts That "Given The Vast Size Of The Nominated Property, The Particular Resilient Nature Of The Ouv, And The Existing Protection In The Nominated Property's Surroundings Through The Nature Conservation Act, The Public Land Act And The Master Plan For Nature Protection And Energy Utilisation, Iucn Agrees That The Designation Of A Buffer Zone Is Not Essential For This Property, Provided These Wider Measures Continue To Be Effective."
"There Is No Buffer Zone, But There Is A Need For One" (Periodic Reporting 2014)
State Parties Found There Was No Need, As The Surrounding Area Was Already Well-Protected. Icomos Found It Necessary And Has Asked For One Via A Minor Boundary Modification In The Future.
"There Is No Buffer Zone, But There Is A Need For One" (Periodic Reporting 2014)
"No Buffer Zone According To The Operational Guidelines For The Implementation Of The World Heritage Convention Has Been Proposed. Icomos Observes That Consideration Should Be Given To Defining A Buffer Zone Encircling The Nominated Oval-Shaped Area"..... Goes Along With The Overall "Emergency Inscription" But Proposes That, Subsequently "With The Assistance Of The Joint Icomos/Whc Reactive Monitoring Mission, The Establishment Of A Buffer Zone"
The Original Nomination Had None. Buffer Zones Have Been Proposed (See Icomos Report 2014) But Have Never Been Formalized. The Official Map Is Without Buffer Zone (Status 2023).
Periodic Reporting 2001 "Actions ...-To Delimit The Buffer Zone"
No Buffer Zone Proposed : "The
Position Of The Scottish Government Is That A World Heritage Natural Site Buffer Zone Is Not A Statutory Designation And Would Not Provide Any Specific Legal Protection." (Ab Ev) - Iucn Is Ok With It
"The Area Covered By The Nomination Is Very Large, Covering Some 56 Km*. It Is Recognized That It Is Made Up Of Geological Strata Bearing Early Hominid Fossils, And Excavations And Chance Finds Suggest That These Cover Most Of The Area Within The Protected Archaeological Reserve. Because Of This Scientific Potential It Is Logical To Propose The Entire Area For Inscription On The World Heritage List. This Fact, Coupled With The Nature Of The Oresent Occupation Of The Land And The Management Policies, Make The Definition Of A Buffer Zone Superfluous And, Indeed, Even Undesirable." (Ab Ev)
